
4baseCare Raises $9.8M For Global Oncology Push
4baseCare raised ₹90 Cr ($9.8M) in Series B to scale clinico-genomic AI and expand across India, Middle East, SEA, LatAm and Central Asia.
TL;DR
4baseCare raised ₹90 Cr ($9.8M) in the first close of its Series B, led by Ashish Kacholia and Lashit Sanghvi with Yali Capital joining. The Bengaluru precision-oncology startup will expand hospital-linked genomics labs across India and markets like the Middle East, Southeast Asia, Latin America and Central Asia, and scale OncoTwin Insights decision support.
Healthtech Startup 4baseCare Raises $9.8 Mn To Fuel Global Expansion
Precision oncology startup 4baseCare has raised INR 90 Cr (about $9.8 Mn) in the first close of its ongoing Series B round, co-led by investors Ashish Kacholia and Lashit Sanghvi, with participation from existing backer Yali Capital. The raise is positioned to accelerate 4baseCare’s expansion across India and into international markets, while scaling its AI-led clinico-genomic intelligence stack for real-world oncology decision support.
From the lens of The AI world organisation, this is exactly the kind of AI-plus-healthcare momentum we expect to see featured and debated across “ai conferences by ai world,” because it sits at the intersection of applied AI, responsible clinical usage, and scalable healthcare infrastructure that can travel across regions. This development also fits the broader conversation tracks we curate at the ai world summit and in ai world organisation events, where founders, clinicians, and enterprise leaders compare what it takes to move AI from pilots into dependable, high-impact deployments. In that spirit, this coverage is framed not only as a funding update, but as a deeper look at what 4baseCare is building, why the model matters, and what the expansion plan signals for the next phase of healthtech.
Series B funding and what it enables
4baseCare’s Series B first close totals INR 90 Cr (approximately $9.8 Mn), and it is co-led by Ashish Kacholia and Lashit Sanghvi, while Yali Capital joined as an existing investor. The company has said it will use the fresh capital to broaden its footprint across India and to strengthen or enter multiple overseas geographies, including the Middle East, Southeast Asia, Latin America, and Central Asia.
What makes this announcement especially notable is how directly the capital is tied to operating scale in clinical settings, rather than being framed only as a “tech build.” 4baseCare plans to expand its hospital-linked genomics laboratory network, which points to a growth strategy grounded in partnerships, testing access, and distribution through care delivery channels. For founders building in regulated environments, that mix of product capability and clinical availability often becomes the real determinant of whether AI stays in presentations or shows up in day-to-day workflows.
Within the ai world summit ecosystem, these are the kinds of examples that matter because they highlight a practical go-to-market story: a platform is only as valuable as the ecosystem that reliably feeds it high-quality data and converts its output into measurable clinical action. That’s also why “ai world summit 2025 / 2026” agendas increasingly lean toward evidence, interoperability, and workflow integration—topics that become unavoidable when companies scale beyond one hospital, one city, or one country.
Building clinico-genomic intelligence for precision oncology
At the core of 4baseCare’s model is an AI-driven approach to analyzing clinical and genomic signals together, with the goal of producing decision-relevant insights in oncology. The company describes its direction as unifying clinico-genomic and real-world data with AI to advance treatment decisions and related use cases in precision oncology. In simple terms, this kind of platform tries to connect what is happening inside the body at a molecular level with what is happening in real-life care—such as therapies used, responses observed, and outcomes recorded—so clinicians can make better-informed choices for similar future patients.
4baseCare’s approach centers on creating population-relevant clinico-genomic intelligence, which is especially significant in regions where genomic datasets and treatment evidence have historically been skewed toward a narrower subset of global populations. The platform direction is also presented as building global genomic diversity across underrepresented populations, reshaping how precision oncology can be practiced when the “reference data” reflects more of the real world. This is not just a technical choice; it’s a strategic wedge, because local relevance can become a competitive advantage in healthcare markets that are frequently underserved by one-size-fits-all evidence.
Another key aspect is the construction of databases that combine large-scale genomic information with clinical context, enabling actionable, doctor-facing insights rather than static reports. On the product side, 4baseCare positions this as a unified workspace that integrates genomic data, clinical history, treatment insights, and real-world evidence so multidisciplinary teams can evaluate options with more structure and speed. For oncology, where timing and confidence matter, that “single view” promise is as important as the sophistication of the model itself.
At the ai world organisation, this is also a useful example for conference programming because it shows how AI systems become most credible when they are built around traceability and interpretability rather than only “accuracy claims.” That theme is likely to remain central at the ai world summit and across ai world organisation events, because healthcare buyers increasingly demand clarity on what the system is doing, what it is not doing, and how clinicians remain in control.
Expansion through hospital-linked genomics labs
A major portion of 4baseCare’s scale-up plan involves growing its hospital-linked genomics lab network in India and internationally, including the Middle East, Southeast Asia, Latin America, and Central Asia. The reason this matters is straightforward: oncology intelligence platforms ultimately depend on reliable testing pipelines, consistent reporting, and a workflow that clinicians can adopt without friction. When a company expands its lab-linked network, it is effectively expanding the “rails” through which genomic data can be captured and converted into downstream clinical insights.
4baseCare has also communicated an affordability and access angle—expanding the network to make cancer care more attainable—by embedding diagnostics closer to real clinical settings through partnerships. This emphasis can become particularly important in emerging markets, where out-of-pocket expenses and uneven diagnostic availability can prevent patients from ever reaching the stage where advanced treatment selection is feasible.
From a market-building standpoint, this is also where cross-border expansion becomes meaningful beyond topline growth. If the company can build comparable pipelines in multiple regions, it can potentially learn from diverse cohorts and refine how it handles varied clinical baselines, different testing practices, and different care pathways. That cross-geography learning loop is one of the least-discussed benefits of expansion in healthtech, and it often becomes a durable moat when executed responsibly.
For “ai conferences by ai world,” these operational questions—labs, networks, standardization, and adoption—tend to be where the best on-stage conversations happen, because they reveal what it actually takes to implement AI at scale in a complex sector. This is also why the ai world summit often draws strong interest from founders and health system leaders: the “deployment story” is where most of the value is won or lost.
OncoTwin Insights and clinical decision support
Alongside geographic expansion, 4baseCare plans to put capital into developing and launching its AI-driven clinical decision support layer, including OncoTwin Insights. In the company’s framing, OncoTwin Insights supports oncologists by surfacing actionable treatment insights using real-world clinico-genomic datasets that are linked to outcomes. That matters because decision support is the moment AI meets the clinician’s workflow: it is where evidence has to be interpretable, defensible, and quickly usable during real patient discussions.
On 4baseCare’s product pages, OncoTwin Insights is described as finding the most similar real-world patients (“twins”) using clinico-genomic similarity and network algorithms, then summarizing treatment journeys and observed outcomes with a transparent rationale. The same description emphasizes weighted similarity across clinical context, biomarkers, and genomics, with auditable drivers of the match and confidence-aware signaling when samples are small. It also explicitly positions the output as decision support rather than a clinical directive, with observational evidence and transparent match rationale.
This “digital twin” style workflow is also reflected in 4baseCare’s broader OncoTwin positioning, where it describes identifying patients with similar clinical and genomic profiles to enable more evidence-based treatment choices. The key takeaway for the wider ecosystem is not that AI “replaces” oncology expertise, but that it can structure real-world evidence in a way that is faster to consume and easier to justify—especially when the tool is built with interpretability in mind.
At the ai world organisation, we see this as a strong example of why clinical AI must be built with careful boundaries: tools that clearly state what they do, how they match, and how confidence should be interpreted tend to be easier for stakeholders to trust and adopt. That is exactly the kind of nuance that audiences expect from the ai world summit and from ai world organisation events, particularly as healthcare AI becomes more visible to regulators, hospital boards, and patient communities.
Funding context: why investors are focused on healthtech now
This round also lands at a moment when India’s healthtech segment is being watched closely for its next wave of growth, particularly in diagnostics and AI-enabled treatment support. Inc42 has cited its “Annual Indian Startup Trends Report, 2025,” stating that healthtech is projected to grow at 39% CAGR from 2025 and surpass $37 Bn+ by 2030, with around $700 Mn raised in 2025. That combination—rapid market growth projections plus substantial recent funding—helps explain why investors continue to back companies that can connect AI capability with real clinical adoption.
In that environment, 4baseCare’s emphasis on a platform approach (clinico-genomic intelligence plus real-world evidence plus clinician-facing decision support) aligns with what many investors look for: repeatable infrastructure, defensible datasets, and a product that can expand across multiple hospital systems and geographies. The fact that the company is pairing expansion with deeper product rollout—rather than pausing one to do the other—suggests it is aiming to grow both coverage and capability simultaneously.
It is also worth noting the company’s prior capital history, which adds continuity to the story. 4baseCare previously raised INR 50 Cr in a Series A round led by Yali Capital, with Infosys participating as well. That earlier backing, combined with the current Series B first close, indicates the company has maintained investor confidence through an extended build cycle—something that is often necessary in clinical categories where product validation and integration can take time.
For audiences tracking the ai world summit 2025 / 2026 circuit, this story is useful because it reflects broader patterns we see across “ai conferences by ai world”: AI-led healthcare companies increasingly win attention when they pair strong data strategy with distribution strategy, and when they treat decision support as a clinician-first product rather than a model-first demo. This is also why the ai world organisation continues to spotlight applied AI in healthcare as a major pillar across ai world organisation events—because the sector is now moving from experimentation into scaled, cross-border execution.