
Seamflow raises $4.5M to cut EU med-device delays
London startup Seamflow exits stealth with $4.5M seed to streamline testing, inspection and certification workflows and shorten EU med-device backlogs.
TL;DR
London startup Seamflow has raised $4.5M in seed funding to tackle the EU’s medical-device certification bottleneck. It’s building AI-assisted workflow tools for testing, inspection and certification teams to reduce admin load, improve coordination, and shorten approval timelines that can stretch beyond 20 months—helping devices reach the market faster without lowering standards.
London-based Seamflow has emerged from stealth with $4.5M in seed funding to reduce the long certification delays that are holding up medical devices in the EU. The company is positioning its AI-driven workflow platform as a practical way to help Testing, Inspection and Certification (TIC) organisations move faster without weakening rigour.
Seamflow’s story matters to anyone tracking the ai world organisation and the ai world summit ecosystem, because certification speed is becoming a make-or-break constraint for real-world AI and medtech innovation—exactly the kind of industry bottleneck discussed at ai conferences by ai world and in ai world organisation events.
The certification backlog problem
Seamflow is targeting certification delays as a quiet but powerful brake on innovation, especially in tightly regulated sectors like medical devices where product access depends on audits, reviews, and extensive documentation before anything can reach patients. In the EU, the queue is severe: the company points to more than 25,000 medical devices stuck in approval lines, with some waiting over 20 months for clearance.
Those wait times create a compounding effect across the value chain, because every additional month adds uncertainty for founders, investors, hospitals, and procurement teams that rely on predictable timelines for upgrades and replacements. When certification capacity becomes scarce, even strong products can be delayed long enough to lose momentum, miss budgets, or get deprioritised in favour of less-regulated markets.
This is why the team frames certification as “one of the world’s most overlooked barriers to innovation,” and why it’s choosing a workflow and capacity angle rather than trying to rebuild regulation itself. From the perspective of the ai world organisation, this is the kind of systems-level friction that often sits behind headline innovation stories, and it’s increasingly relevant to the themes surfaced through the ai world summit and ai world organisation events.
What Seamflow is building (and who it serves)
Seamflow is building a platform designed specifically for TIC organisations—the bodies that carry out inspections, audits, and certification work that allows physical products and infrastructure to go live. The company says it is already working with major enterprise certifiers and is focusing on practical workflow pain points such as document management, auditor scheduling, and coordination of multi-team reviews.
The core pitch is not “replace experts,” but “free expert time,” by stripping out repetitive admin and moving teams toward judgment-focused decisions where human oversight is essential. Seamflow describes its approach as embedding AI into certification workflows so teams can organise documentation, coordinate review steps, and reduce operational drag that slows decisions down.
Seamflow also sets an explicit performance ambition: bringing certification timelines down to under three months by reducing friction in how work is prepared, routed, reviewed, and scheduled. If that target holds in practice, it could change how medtech teams plan launches, because certification delays would move from an opaque risk factor into something closer to an operational metric that can be managed.
For readers coming from the ai world summit community—especially those building applied AI for healthcare, industrial systems, or safety-critical environments—this approach is notable because it focuses on the “infrastructure of trust” around technology, not just the technology itself. In other words, it’s aligned with the real-world constraints that often show up in ai conferences by ai world conversations: deployment, compliance, verification, and accountability.
Funding round and backers
Seamflow raised $4.5M in seed funding as it stepped out of stealth. The round was co-led by Northzone and Initialised Capital, described as the fund run by Y Combinator president Garry Tan.
The company also brought in notable angels, including former Microsoft strategist Charlie Songhurst and footballer Mario Götze. Entrepreneur First and Nebular participated in the round as well.
Seamflow’s co-founder Konstantin Klingler said the company did not disclose valuation details. Looking ahead over the next year, Klingler said the plan is to expand the team, enhance product capabilities, and support a growing number of TIC organisations globally.
The company also signals “builder credibility” through its team composition, noting alumni experience from UK energy unicorn FUSE Energy and large tech companies including Google, Amazon, and X. That matters in this category because workflow tools for regulated environments tend to fail when they ignore how auditors, reviewers, and certifiers actually operate day to day.
From the ai world organisation lens, this is also a familiar pattern: capital flows toward teams that pair deep operational understanding with credible engineering execution, especially when they aim to modernise slow-moving, high-stakes industries. It’s the kind of founder-market fit and adoption story that frequently resonates at the ai world summit 2025 / 2026 level, where buyers and builders compare what “enterprise-ready” really looks like in practice.
From med devices to the £230B TIC market
Although Seamflow is starting with medical devices, it is explicitly positioning itself for the broader TIC market, which it sizes at £230B globally. The company frames TIC as a foundational layer under factory operations and industrial infrastructure, where increasing regulatory complexity is driving demand that certification bodies are struggling to meet.
In that context, medical devices become a wedge into a wider operational problem: certification organisations face overloaded pipelines, growing documentation burdens, and coordination challenges across multiple teams and stakeholders. Seamflow says its system helps by reducing repetitive work and improving coordination, which can unlock scarce expert capacity rather than trying to “hire out” of the bottleneck.
The company’s narrative also highlights Europe as a region where certification is deeply tied to industrial progress, implying that workflow improvements in certification can have spillover benefits across the physical economy. Even small gains—faster scheduling, cleaner document trails, fewer handoff errors—can translate into shorter time-to-market and more predictable planning for regulated product teams.
This cross-industry expansion is important because it broadens the addressable market beyond one regulatory regime, while staying inside a consistent buyer persona: organisations responsible for audits, inspection, and certification across categories. For the ai world summit audience, it also underscores a key point: AI adoption opportunities often sit in the “pipes and plumbing” of industrial decision-making, not only in customer-facing apps.
Why Seamflow thinks it can win
When asked about competitive alternatives, the co-founder pointed to in-house platforms built on general-purpose tooling like Palantir, plus legacy systems that many organisations still run. Seamflow’s argument is that these options are not designed for the “depth and specificity” of TIC workflows, which is why certifiers would prefer a purpose-built platform rather than customising broad tools indefinitely.
This positioning is a classic wedge in regulated enterprise: “We’re not another generic workflow layer; we’re tuned to your domain, your artefacts, your audit trail, and your constraints.” If Seamflow can prove it reduces cycle time without creating audit risk, it can become infrastructure—hard to rip out once embedded into how certification teams work.
Seamflow’s founders, Konstantin Klingler and Yusufhan Kircova, are described as being in their mid-twenties, and they are tackling what they call a major choke point in the TIC sector. Their thesis is straightforward: most certification delay is not caused by a lack of expertise, but by workflow overload—too many documents, too many coordination steps, and too many repetitive actions that can be streamlined.
From the ai world organisation perspective, that thesis is increasingly relevant to how we talk about AI in the real economy: the biggest ROI can come from compressing “time” (cycle time, review time, scheduling time) rather than only expanding “capability.” That is also why stories like this fit naturally into ai conferences by ai world programming, where operational transformation matters as much as model performance.
Diversity note (early-stage stance)
On diversity, Klingler said the company is still small and does not publish formal diversity statistics yet, but aims to build an inclusive team from the start and hire across diverse backgrounds as it scales. That framing is common for early-stage teams, but it also sets an expectation that hiring practices will be part of the company’s credibility as it grows.
In many regulated industries, trust extends beyond the product into the organisation—how it recruits, trains, and retains talent who are responsible for quality, audit readiness, and decision integrity. That’s another reason why the TIC space is different from consumer SaaS: the “human system” is part of the product’s real-world performance.
What this means for innovation (and AI World readers)
Seamflow is ultimately trying to speed up certification without weakening the trust and rigour that the TIC industry is built on, and the company explicitly states its goal is to support skilled professionals with AI that helps manage rising complexity and demand. If the platform works as described, it could reduce how long critical products remain “stuck” between engineering completion and real-world availability, especially in medical devices where timing can affect both commercial outcomes and care delivery.
For builders and decision-makers who follow the ai world organisation, this is a useful reminder that “innovation bottlenecks” are often administrative and procedural rather than technical—and that applied AI can create outsized impact by removing friction from high-stakes workflows. It also reinforces why the ai world summit focus on deployment realities is timely, because the market is rewarding teams that can turn AI into measurable cycle-time improvements inside complex organisations.